Kingston Community Still Waiting on Jetty Claim
- Jess Dempster
- 2 days ago
- 2 min read

South Australia's south-east community of Kingston SE is still waiting for clarity on the future of its historic jetty.
The 150-year-old structure was destroyed by severe storms and seven-metre swells last winter, with damage estimated at $11.2 million.
The asset is leased by Kingston District Council from the State Government, which self-insures its jetties.

Mayor Jeff Pope says nearly eight months on, the community still has no outcome from the insurance assessment.
“It is extremely frustrating for our community and the many thousands of visitors that enjoyed coming to fish and walk on the historic jetty, that we have no clarity on the outcome of the insurance assessment and for us to share, consider and agree on re-build options,” Mayor Pope said.
“Council has been fielding enquiries every day from the community and visitors alike about what is happening and we don’t know what to tell people. Our requests for clarity have not as yet been responded to, despite it now having been several months since being destroyed and frankly our community deserves better.”
A 2022 State-commissioned business case estimated a like-for-like rebuild would cost about $17 million. Engineers have since recommended any new structure be built at least 1.2 metres higher to withstand increased storm activity.
Mayor Pope said Council believes it has identified a more innovative and cost-effective rebuild option, but needs urgent direction from the State.
“Now that the Jetty has been lost, we think we have a potential innovative way to re-build the Jetty at a much lower whole of life (50 year) cost than previous repair options proposed, however, we need to understand the State’s position,” he said.
He warned the looming caretaker period ahead of the State election could further delay progress.
“Once we do have answers, Council will need to negotiate with the State on revised lease terms and plans and then go through a community consultation process … so time is of the essence.”






Comments